VIKRAMAJIT SEN, A.M.SAPRE
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vikramajit Sen, J.—Leave granted.
2. Applications for correcting the cause title and all the applications for impleadment as party respondent are allowed.
3. In these Appeals, we are concerned with the renewal as also the appointment of District Government Counsel (Civil and Criminal) in the Subordinate Courts across the State of Uttar Pradesh. The State as the Appellant, has assailed the final judgment and order dated 5.11.2014 in Writ Petition being Misc. Bench No. 9127 of 2012 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench. The High Court in this impugned Order has quashed the Orders of the State Government terminating the appointment of District Government Counsel and has further directed the State Government to reconsider their renewal. Indubitably, the appointments as well as the renewals would have to be in consonance with Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C. for brevity) and the Legal Remembrancer Manual (hereinafter referred to as the ‘LR Manual’) applicable throughout the State of U.P. The Manual which came into force in 1975 inter alia prescribes mandatory ‘consultation’ with the District Judge and the Dis
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi v. State of UP
State of UP v. State of UP Law Officers Association
State of UP v. Rakesh Kumar Keshri
Andi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandas Swami Suvarna Jayanti Mahotsav Smarak Trust v. V. R. Rudani
Zee Telefilms Ltd. v. Union of India
State of UP v. Ashok Kumar Nigam
Union of India v. Raghubir Singh
Chandra Prakash v. State of UP
Sub-Inspector Rooplal v. Lt. Governor
Government of Andhra Pradesh v. A. P. Jaiswal
State of U.P. v. Rakesh Kumar Keshari
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.