State of Maharashtra VS Rajesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

B.R.GOVAI, SWAPNA JOSHI
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant/State: Mrs. Bharti H. Dangre, Public Prosecutor assisted by Smt. Jyoti Vajani, Special Counsel, for applicant State.
For Respondent No. 1:Mr. Mir Nagman Ali, Advocate.
For the Respondent no. 2:Mr. C. R. Thakur, Advocate.
For the complainant:Mr. R.M. Daga, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

B.R. Vagai, J.—Since the learned Sessions Judge, Nagpur by judgment and order dated 4.2.2016 in Sessions Trial No. 488/14 has awarded death penalty to the accused Nos. 1 & 2, the reference has been made to this Court for confirmation in Criminal Confirmation Case No.

2. Both the accused/appellants have also preferred appeals being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 4.2.2016. Though both the appellants are condemned persons, for the sake of convenience, hereinafter we will be referring to them as accused.

3. The prosecution case in nutshell as could be gathered from the material placed on record is thus :PW.1 Dr. Mukesh Chandak, the first informant, is a resident of GuruVandana Housing Society, Lakadganj Road, Nagpur. PW.1 Dr. Mukesh Chandak as well as his wife Premal are both Dentists by profession and running a clinic known as “Chandak Dental Clinic” which is located at Darodkar Square, Central Avenue Road, Nagpur. The couple was blessed with two sons, namely, Dhruva 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

B.R.GOVAI, SWAPNA JOSHIState of Maharashtra – AppellantVersusRajesh – Respondent

Cases Referred (6)

B.R.GOVAI, SWAPNA JOSHI
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh – Respondent