SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.G.SHAH
Akbar Amirali Kasambhai Jesani – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Mr. Hardik A Dave, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Manan Mehta, APP

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

S.G. Shah, J.—Rule. Mr.Manan Mehta, learned APP waives service of rule for respondent – State.

2. Heard learned advocate Mr.Hardik Dave for the applicant and learned APP Mr.Manan Mehta for the respondent – State.

3. Since applicant is ready with the compilation of papers of chargesheet, which are already supplied to the other side, by consent of both the parties, matter is taken up for final disposal, considering the fact that admitting such matters and keeping it pending for final decision would unnecessarily disturb the pending trial before the Sessions Court, more particularly, when facts and circumstances are so clear, which otherwise requires admission of the present revision application, thereby to protect the applicant in the form of stay against the further proceedings, which is not advisable.

4. The applicant has challenged the order dated 18.4.2016 below Exh.7 by the 5th Addl.District & Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural), Mirzapur, Ahmedabad in Sessions Case No.99 of 2015. Such application at Exh.7 was preferred by the present applicant being accused No.2 in such sessions case, which has arisen out of Bagodara police station C.R.No.I-8 of 2011 dated 27.5.20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top