SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH
Smaarftech Technologies (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
(In Cr. WJC No.1047 of 2015)
For the Petitioners:Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
For the State: Mr. Manoj Kumar Ambastha, GP-14
For the Respondent No.2:Ms. Soni Srivastava, Advocate
(In Cr. WJC No.1049 of 2015)
For the Petitioners:Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
For the State: Mr. S.K. Sinha, GP-15
For the Respondent No.2:Ms. Soni Srivastava, Advocate
(In Cr. WJC No.1154 of 2015)
For the Petitioners:Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
For the State: Mr. R.K. Roy, GP-18
For the Respondent No.2:Ms. Soni Srivastava, Advocate
(In Cr. WJC No.1064 of 2015)
For the Petitioners:Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
For the State: Mr. Hrait Bhushan, AC to GP-17
For the Respondent No.2:Ms. Soni Srivastava, Advocate

Smaarftech Technologies (P. ) Ltd. VS State of Bihar
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top