J.B.PARDIWALA
Bhartiben Bipinbhai Tamboli – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER
J.B. Pardiwala, J.—In the Affairs of this World, Men are saved, not by Faith, but by the Lack of it. Benjamin Frenklin.
2. As the issues raised in both the captioned applications are the same and the prayer is also to quash the selfsame proceedings initiated under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
3. The Special Criminal Application No.5672 of 2016 has been filed by the mother-in-law of the respondent no.2. The respondents nos.3 and 4 are the grandchildren of the writ-applicant. The respondent no.2 is married to one Mehul Bipinbhai Tamboli i.e. the son of the writ-applicant. In the wedlock, the respondents nos.3 and 4 were born.
4. The writ-applicant herein has prayed for the following reliefs:-
“26(A) be pleased to quash qua the present petitioners the impugned complaint registered as Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.131 of 2016 and pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate’s Court, Bhavnagar and the impugned Order dated 05.04.2016 pass
Krishna Bhatacharjee Vs. Sarathi Choudhury and Another’
Jaydipsinh Prabhatsinh Jhala and Others Vs. State of Gujarat and Others
V.D. Bhanot Vs. Savita Bhanot Supreme Court (2012) 3 SCC 183: [2012] 1 Supreme 716. (Para 25)
D. Veluswamy Vs. Patchaimmal (2010) 10 SCC 469: [2010] 7 Supreme 321. (Para 28)
Sandhya Wankhede Vs. Manoj Bhimrao Wnakhede (2011) 3 SCC 650. (Para 31)
Radhey Shyam Khemka v. State of Bihar
R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab
Dinesh Dutt Joshi Vs. State of Rajasthan
M/S. Pepsi Foods Ltd. & Anr. vs. Special Judicial Magistrate & Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.