SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.S.CHANDURKAR
Parshwa Engineering Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Shri M. P. Khajanchi, Advocate
For the Respondent No.2:Shri M.A. Vishwarupe, Advocate

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

A.S. Chandurkar, J.—Both these criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seek quashing of the complaints filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, the said Act). As common challenges are raised, the applications are decided by this common judgment.

2. The non-applicant no.2 herein is a Corporation that has filed two complaints under Section 138 of the said Act. In Criminal Application No.3184/2007, the complaint filed is Criminal Case No.6029/2005. In said complaint, the present applicants have been arrayed as the accused persons. According to the complainant, the accused Nos.2 & 3 on behalf of the accused No.1 which is a Firm had approached it for financial assistance. After verifying the relevant documents, the complainant sanctioned raw material assistance to the Firm. An agreement was entered into between the parties. Pursuant to the assistance scheme, the accused Nos.1 and 2 issued cheques bearing Nos.295294, 295295, 295296 and 295297 dated 17th May, 2001 These cheques issued by the accused nos.1 and 2 were dishonoured on 18.5.2001. After issuing notice under Section 138 of the said A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top