SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Ramsingh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Shri Anshu Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1: Shri Devendra Chaubey, Public Prosecutor
For the Respondent No.2: None

JUDGMENT

G.S. Ahluwalia, J.—This application under Section 482 of CrPC has been filed for quashing the FIR in Crime no.258/2016 registered at Police Station Shamshabad, District Vidisha for the offence punishable under Section 306/34 of IPC as well as consequential criminal proceedings.

2. The necessary facts for the disposal of the present application in short are that an information was given to the Police Station by the Community Health Centre, Shamshabad, District Vidisha to the effect that one patient (boy) was brought to the hospital as he had consumed some poisonous substance and during treatment, the said boy has expired. It is not out of place to mention here that applicant, who is the father of the boy, who had committed suicide, had taken him to the hospital. On this intimation, the police conducted marg enquiry. The dead body of the deceased Sunil Yadav was sent for postmortem. The statements of the witnesses were recorded. Statements of Pratap Singh, the material father-in-law of the deceased and other maternal uncles of the deceased were recorded. It is alleged that Rukmani Bai was married to the applicant. Rukmani Bai has expired and at the time of her death, decease

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top