SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SANJAY KAROL
Pramanik Dey – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Debesh Chandra Roy, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. A. Roy Barman, Addl. P.P.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Sanjay Karol, C.J.—The present accused-appellant stands convicted for having committed an offence punishable under Section 363 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as POCSO Act). In relation to an offence under IPC, he stands directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1(one) year and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- (rupees one thousand) and in default thereof, simple imprisonment for a period of 1(one) month; and in relation to an offence under POCSO Act, he stands directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7(seven) years and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- (rupees one thousand) and in default thereof, simple imprisonment for a period of 1(one) month.

2. Briefly stated, it is the case of the prosecution that on 28.12.2013, the accused-appellant, forcibly took away the prosecutrix in a vehicle and made her spend the night in the house of his relative. The following day, she was taken to the forest where she was subjected to sexual assault. Finding his daughter not to return home from her private tuition, Sri Badal Das Choudhury (PW-6), fath

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top