SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
Raheema – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sri Shivanand V. Pattanashetti, Advocate
For the Respondent: Sri Gururaj V. Hasilakar, HCGP

JUDGMENT

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar, J.—The present appeal is preferred calling in question the judgment of conviction and order on sentence dated 26.12.2012 passed in Sessions Case No146/2011 by the I-Addl. Sessions Judge, Bijapur.

2. The brief facts of the case are as under:

Accused No.1 having suspected that thecomplainant/PW.1 has an illicit relation with her husband and thereby got enraged against the complainant and with common intention along with accused No.2 who is brother-in-law of accused No.1 to commit murder of the complainant/PW.1 on 29.06.2010at about morning 6:00 a.m. both accused Nos.1 and 2came on the roof of the maternal aunt’s house of the complainant and assaulted her with chopper on the head of the complainant/PW.1 and abused in filthy language and thus caused grievous injuries on the head of the complainant and if accused No.1 would have succeeded in her attempt then the complainant would have been done to death and for this accused No.2 had instigated accused No.1. Therefore, with these averments PW.1 had lodged first information statement (FIS) before the police and accordingly the police have registered FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 109,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top