SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEEPAK ROSHAN
Suman Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate
For the Respondent: A.P.P.
For the Respondent No.2:Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Deepak Roshan, J.—The instant criminal revision application is directed against the judgment dated 24.07.2014, passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Sahibganj in Criminal Appeal No.24 of 2014, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed and the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 14.02.2014, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class in P.C.R Case No.366 of 2007 corresponding to T.R. Case No. 151 of 2014 whereby the petitioner has been convicted for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.74,05,000/- (Rs. Seventy four lacs and five thousand) out of which Rs.74,00,000/- (Rs. Seventy four lacs) will be given to the complainant as compensation under Section 357 Cr.P.C. and in default of payment of fine further S.I. for six month, has been affirmed.

2. The prosecution case in brief is that a current account bearing No.0109000817300 at S.B.I Mirzachowki Branch was opened and operated by Ramakant Singh through power of attorney holder Ashu Singh (in the style Ramakant Singh POA Ashu Singh) having over draft fac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top