SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANJEEV KUMAR
Umesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Rekha Wangnoo – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners: None
For the Respondent:Mr. M.A. Qayoom, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Kumar, J.—The petitioners have invoked inherent powers of this Court vested by Section 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure for seeking quashment of the criminal complaint entitled “Rekha Wangnoo vs. Umesh Sharma and others” as also orders dated 14th of December, 2015, and 20th of April, 2017, passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Budgam (“the Trial Magistrate” for short).

2. Briefly put, the facts leading to the filing of this petition are that the respondent herein, who shall be hereinafter referred to as the complainant, filed a complaint before the Trial Magistrate against the petitioners for commission offences under Section 193, 199, 209, 463, 464, 466, 469 and 120-B of Ranbir Penal Code for some alleged forgery committed with the Court. As per the complaint, the petitioners are related to each other. The daughter of petitioner No.3, namely, Preeti Sharma, is married to one Rajesh Qazi, brother of the complainant. Owing to strained relations and matrimonial dispute between the two, there is litigation pending in different courts at Ghaziabad, Jammu and Srinagar.

3. It is alleged that in the dispute between husband and wife, the petitioners along with th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top