M.K.MUKHERJEE, S.MOHAN
State Of W. B. – Appellant
Versus
MOHD KHALID – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S. MOHAN, J.
( 1 ) CRIMINAL Appeal No. 327 of 1994 is directed against the judgment and order dated 13/04/1994 of the High Court of Calcutta in C. O. No. 9121 (W) of 1993.
( 2 ) CRIMINAL Appeal No. 328 of 1994 is directed against the judgment and order dated 13/04/1994 of the High Court of Calcutta in C. O. No. 8377 (W) of 1993.
( 3 ) CRIMINAL Appeal No. 329 of 1994 is directed against the judgment and order dated 13/04/1994 of the High Court of Calcutta in C. O. No. 8378 (W) of 1993.
( 4 ) ALL these cases arise out of writ petitions filed in the High Court of Calcutta challenging the validity of sanction and taking cognizance of the cases against each of the respondents by the Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as tada ). A further challenge in the writ petition was also made to the vires of TADA. The orders of sanction and taking cognizance were quashed. The challenge to the Act was not gone into since the same was pending at the relevant time before this Court.
( 5 ) TO highlight the issue involved, it is enough if we advert to the facts in Criminal Appeal No. 328 of 1994 since C. O. No. 8377 (W)
Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab
Municipal Corpn. of Delhi v. Ram Kishan Rohtagi
Municipal Corpn. of Delhi v. Purshotam Dass Jhunjunwala
Supdt.and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, W.B. v. Anil Kumar Bhunja
Vadilal Panchal v. Dattatraya Dulaji Ghadigaonkar
relied on : E.G. Barsay v. State of Bombay
referred to : Mathuri v. State of Punjab
Major Som Nath v. Union of India
A.C. Aggarwal, Sub-Divisional Magistrate v. Ram Kali
Siemens Engg. and Mfg. Co. of India Ltd. v. Union of India
State of Karnataka v. L. Muniswamy
State of Bihar v. Ramesh Singh
Yash Pal Mittal v. State of Punjab
Satya Narain Musadi v. State of Bihar
Satya Narain Musadi v. State of Bihar
Yogendra Morarji v. State of Gujarat
Mohammad Usman Mohammad Hussain Maniyar v. State of Maharashtra
distinguished : Lima Charan v. State of M.P
referred to : R.S. Nayak v. A.R. Antulay
Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad v. Dilip Nathurnul Chordia
Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi v. Jitendra Bhimraj Bijjaya
Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi v. Jitendra Bhimraj Bijjaya
Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi v. Jitendra Bhimraj Bijjaya
Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi v. Jitendra Bhimraj Bijjaya
followed : State of Biharv. P.P. Sharma
Maninder Kaur v. Rajinder Singh
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
Radhey Shyam Khernka v. State ofBihar
relied on : Ajay Aggarwal v. Union of India
Sanjay Dutt v. State through CBI
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra
followed : State of Maharashtra v. Abdal Hamid Haji Mohammed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.