K.NATARAJAN
Brijmohan K. S. – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER
K. Natarajan, J.—This petition is filed by the de facto complainant/first informant under Section 439(2) read with 482 of Cr.P.C. for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2 by the LXVII Additional City Civil Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, (CCH-68) in Crl. Misc.2192/2001 dated 12.3.2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 406, 420, 465, 468, 471 read with 34 of IPC in Crime No.8/2021 registered by Sheshadripuram Police Station, Bengaluru.
2. Heard Sri P.P. Hegde, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi B. Naik, learned Senior Counsel along with Smt. Vijetha R. Naik, learned counsel for respondent No.2 as also Smt. Rashmi Jadhav, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1-State.
3. The case of the petitioner is that he is the first informant before the Police and he has filed a complaint to the Sheshadripuram Police on 27.02.2021 alleging that the first informant is one of the Partners of M/s. Khoday Eshwarsa and Sons and RCA Industries. M/s. Khoday Eshwarsa and Sons is a partnership firm engaged in the manufacture and production of Indian made liquor and carrying on business since 60 years. The office of the firm is sit
P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement
Sudhir v. State of Maharashtra and another
Maruthi Nivrutti v. State of Maharastra and another
Ranjit Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
State Rep. by the CBI v. Anil Sharma
Dolat Ram and others v. State of Haryana
Simranjit Singh Mann v. State of Bihar
State (Delhi Administration) v. Sanjay Gandhi
Siddaram Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.