O. CHINNAPPA REDDY AND M.M. DUTT, JJ.
Writ Petn. (Criminal) Nos. 136 and 630 of 1986 with Spl. Leave Petn. (Criminal) Nos. 137 and 577 of 1986, D/-19-9-1986.
Raghubir Singh and others, Petitioners
Versus
State of Bihar, Respondent.
AND
Simranjit Singh Mann, Petitioner
Versus
State of Bihar, Respondent.
Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 – sections 167(2), 442(1), 441, 437(5), 439(2), 444 and 309(2) – Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 21, 32, 136 - Police patrol party - Indo-Nepal border – Detention order - An order of preventive detention under National Security Act had been made against him - He was wanted in that connection but had gone underground - While crossing Indo-Nepal Border on search number of documents and other articles were seized - Whether case should be transferred to Court of Special Judge could be considered at stage when question whether there was a prima facie case was to be considered - Whether there was a prima facie case was to be considered - Whether right to a speedy trial which forms part of fundamental right to life and liberty guaranteed by Art. 21 has been infringed is ultimately a question of fairness in administration of criminal justice even as acting fairly is of essence of principles of natural - Whether any of accused was responsible for publicity and whether it was in pursuance of conspiracy – Held, In present case High Court Special Judge have held that order for release on bail came to an end with passage of time on filing of charge-sheet - That Court have explained is not a correct view - Question now is what is appropriate order to make? order for release on bail was not an order on merits but was what one may call an order-on-default, an order that could be rectified for special reasons after defect was cured - order was made long ago but for one reason or other, accused failed to take advantage of order for several months - Probably for that reason, prosecuting agency did not move in matter and seems to have proceeded on assumption that order lapsed with filing of charge-sheet - Question is should we now send matter down to High Court to give an opportunity to prosecution to move that Court for cancellation of bail Having regard to the entirety of circumstances, long lapse of time since original order for bail was made consequent change in circumstances and situation, and directions that we have now given for expeditious disposal of the case, Court do not think that Court will be justified in exercising our discretion to interfere under Art. 136 of Constitution in these matters at this stage - Special leave petitions are, therefore, dismissed - Nothing that Court have said is to be construed as an expression of opinion on merits of case - Order accordingly.
Judgement
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:- On the intervening night of November 29/30, 1984, the Security Police Patrol on duty near Jogbani Checkpost noticed a jeep speeding towards the Indo-Nepal border. The jeep was stopped. There were five occupants in the jeep. One of them was Simranjit Singh Mann who had been dismissed from the Indian Police Service. An order of preventive detention under the National Security Act had been made against him on August 29, 1986. He was wanted in that connection but had gone underground. On being questioned by the police patrol party, they first refused to disclose their names and identity. This aroused the suspicions of the police party. One of the officers was able to identify Simranjit Singh Mann. The five occupants in the jeep were searched as also their baggage. A sum of Rs. 62,722 was found with one of the occupants, who it is alleged offered the police party a large amount as bribe if they were allowed to cross the Indo-Nepal Border. As a result of the search, a number of documents and other articles were seized. From the person of Simranjit Singh Mann were seized, a copy of a letter dated June 2, 1984 from Simranjit Singh Mann to the Chief Secretary, Punjab, a copy of the letter of resignation dated June 18, 1984 of Simranjit Singh Mann, the Passport of Simranjit Singh Mann, two photographs of Jarnail Singh Bhindrawala, a letter from Simranjit Singh Mann to Birbal Nath, a letter addressed to one Arun Kumar Agarwal asking him to help the bearer in all possible ways and an anonymous letter warning Simranjit Singh Mann of likely attempts to liquidate him and advising him to leave the country. Simranjit Singh Mann refused to sign the seizure memo. From Kamikar Singhs person, currency notes of the value of Rs. 62,722 were seized. An amount of Rs. 25,000, it is said, was offered as bribe to the Police Officers. From Jagpal Singhs suitcase was seized a booklet in English entitled Sikhs and Foreign Affairs and a combined road map of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal. Among other articles seized were a booklet in English written by Narinder Singh Bhuller said to contain anti-Government and Sikh separatist propaganda, a notebook containing material about the worlds leading underground organisations said to be in Manns handwriting, a register in which Mann was said to be writing the history of Amritsar in which the Indian Army is said to have been described as the enemy. Consequent on operation Blue-Star, extremist Sikhs are said to be described as nationalists and defenders of the motherland and Mrs. Gandhi, the then Prime Minister is described in a derogatory fashion. At the check-post, a photograph of Simranjit Singh Mann was available and it was verified that the person suspected to be Simranjit Singh Mann was actually Simaranjit Singh Mann. The other persons gave their names as Kamikar Singh. Charan Singh, Jagpal Singh and Raghubir Singh. Kamikar Singh was the person who had made the offer of bribe. A First Information Report was then registered at the Jogbani Police Station for references under Ss. 121-A, 124-A, 123, 153-A, 505 and 120-B of the Penal Code and S. 5(iii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Investigation started. On December 11, 1985 a charge-sheet was submitted before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Araria against the five accused persons for offences under Ss. 121-A, 123, 124-A, 153-A, 165-A, 505 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code.
2. Before the charge-sheet was filed, on December 4, 1984 Simranjit Singh Mann was served with the order of detention under the National Security Act and sent to Bhagalpur Jail. The other four accused were also detained under the National Security Act at Bhagalpur. On March to 1985 the four accused other than Simaranjit Singh Mann moved the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Araria for bail in the criminal case which was then being investigated claiming to be released under the proviso (a) of S. 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.