SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AJAY BHANOT
Junaid – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Mohammad Mustafa, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties: Maya Pati Pandey, G.A.

JUDGMENT

The judgement is being structured in the following conceptual framework to facilitate the discussion:

I. Introduction

II. Submissions of learned counsels

III. Defining the controversy and its origins

IV. Rights of an accused in a bail application

V. Child rights jurisprudence: authorities and principles

VI. Relevant provisions from POCSO Act read with POCSO Rules:

A. Right of victim to receive notice of the bail application and mode of service

B. Applicability of Section 439(IA) Cr.P.C.

C. Case Laws: Discussion

D. Enforcement of rights of the child under POCSO Act r/w POCSO Rules

E. Protecting the identity of the child

VII. Timeline and procedure for maturation of bail application

VIII. Monitoring and implementation of the directions in the judgement

IX. Order on bail application

X. Appendix

I. Introduction:

2. While arguing the bail application Sri Mohd. Mustafa, learned counsel for the applicant submitted at length that the question of service of notice upon the victim raises legal issues of public importance. Considering the general importance of



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top