Rakesh @ Pintya Ramesh Rane VS State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

NITIN JAMDAR, C.V.BHADANG
Rakesh @ Pintya Ramesh Rane – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
Mr. Shirish Gupte, Senior Advocate i/b. Ms. Supriya Kak for the Appellant in Cr. Appeal No.257/2013 i/b. Mr. Aniket U. Nikam with Mr. Aashish I. Satpute for the Appellant in Cr. Appeal No.259/2019.
Mr. Nitin Sejpal with Ms. Akshata Desai and Mr. Hiren Mehta for the Respondents in Cr. Appeal No.919/2013 and for the Applicant in I/A No.1149/2020.
Mr. Amin Solkar with Ms. Misbaah Solkar and Mr. Pratik Karande for Respondent No.3 in Cr. Appeal Nos.359/2013 and 919/2013.
Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, APP for the Appellant-State in Appeal No.919/2013 and for the Respondent-State in Cr.Appeal Nos.257/2013, 259/2013, 359/2013 & I/A No.1149/2020.
Mr. Shekhar Ingawale for the Appellant in Cr.Appeal No.359/2013.

JUDGMENT

Nitin Jamdar, J.—These four criminal appeals arise from the judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibaug dated 28 August 2010 in Sessions Case No. 104 of 2010.

2. Six persons, (1) Satish Yashwant Patil (2) Atul Suresh Thakur (3) Krishna Kashinath Patil (4) Sumedh @ Sumit @ Pappu Chandrakant Yerunkar (5) Rakesh @ Pintya Ramesh Rane and (6) Pradeep Mahadeo Mali were accused in Sessions Case No.104/2010 and charged for the offences punishable under section 302, 307, 120-B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3, 25 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959.

3. Accused No.4- Pappu @ Sumedh Yerunkar and Accused No.5- Rakesh @ Pintya Rane have been convicted under section 302 read with section 34 of the IPC. Accused No.5 has filed Criminal Appeal No.257/2013, and Accused No.4 has filed Criminal Appeal No.259/2013 challenging their conviction.

4. Accused No.1- Satish Yashwant Patil, Accused No.2-Atul Suresh Thakur, Accused No.3- Krishna Kashinath Patil and Accused No.6- Pradeep Mahadeo Mali have been acquitted. Criminal Appeal No.359/2013 is filed by Ajay Thakur, brother of the deceased and Criminal Appeal No.919/2013 is filed by the State of M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

NITIN JAMDAR, C.V.BHADANGRakesh @ Pintya Ramesh Rane – AppellantVersusState of Maharashtra – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

NITIN JAMDAR, C.V.BHADANG
Rakesh @ Pintya Ramesh Rane – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent