Santosh Haldankar @ Santosh Gurudas Haldankar VS State of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

S.KUMAR
Santosh Haldankar @ Santosh Gurudas Haldankar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
Criminal Miscellaneous No.37919 of 2019:
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad and Ms. Jyoti Kumari, Advocates
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32987 of 2019:
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad and Ms. Jyoti Kumari, Advocates
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33426 of 2019:
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No.1 and Ms. Jyoti Kumari, Advocates
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 33800 of 2019:
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Ms. Jyoti Kumari, Advocates
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34056 of 2019:
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad and Ms. Jyoti Kumari, Advocates
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34553 of 2019:
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad and Ms. Jyoti Kumari, Advocates
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34859 of 2019:
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad and Ms. Jyoti Kumari, Advocates
Criminal Miscellaneous No.35364 of 2019:
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad and Ms. Jyoti Kumari, Advocates

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

S. Kumar, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C has been filed for quashing the order dated 10.01.2019 passed in Complaint Case No. 1077 (C) of 2018, passed by learned ACJM-III, Patna, by which learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offences under Section 199 and 200 of IPC and issued processes against the petitioners for their appearance to face the trial.

3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case is that Opposite Party No. 2 filed complaint case before the learned CJM, Patna with following allegations:-

(a) Opposite Party No. 2 (Complainant) was appointed on the post of Branch Head, Patna-Operations, issued under the signature of head H.R. Operation, HDFC Bank Ltd. Mumbai and Opposite Party No. 2 joined on 26.03.2012 at whole sale banking operation, Jamal Road, Patna.

(b) Opposite Party No. 2 (Complainant) duty was to properly re-check the clearing cheques and trade related documents before sending it to the Central Processing Units and while working Opposite Party No. 2 (complainant) an inquiry was initiated against him and he was put under suspension by order dated 25.02.2016 on charge of some serio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

S.KUMARSantosh Haldankar @ Santosh Gurudas Haldankar – AppellantVersusState of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (9)

S.KUMAR
Santosh Haldankar @ Santosh Gurudas Haldankar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent