Mahaveer VS State of Rajasthan through PP.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

PRAKASH GUPTA, CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Mahaveer – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan through PP. – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
CRLA No.186 of 2018:
For the Appellants:Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Anurag Pareek and Mr. Aniket Sharma, Advocates
For the Respondents:Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Advocate and Mr. N.S. Gurjar, Public Prosecutor for State
CRLA No.376 of 2018:
For the Appellants:Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Rinesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate and Mr. N.S. Gurjar, Public Prosecutor for State

JUDGMENT

Chandra Kumar Songara, J.—

D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 186/2018 :

Instant D.B. Criminal Appeal No.186/2018 under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred on behalf of the convict-appellants, namely (i) Mahaveer s/o Bhanwar Lal and (ii) Prem Shankar s/o Choga Lal, assailing the impugned judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 04.04.2018 passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Bundi, in Sessions Case No.39/2013, whereby the appellants/accused were convicted and sentenced as under:-

Offence U/s.	Imprisonment	Fine	Sentence in default of payment
302 I.P.C.	Life Imprisonment	Rs.25,000/- Each	To further undergo six months simple imprisonment

2. Complainant, namely Bhanwar Singh Rajput has also preferred D.B. Criminal Leave to Appeal No.209/2018 under Section 378 (3) readwith Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the impugned judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 04.04.2018 passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Bundi, in Sessions Case No.39/2013, whereby th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

PRAKASH GUPTA, CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARAMahaveer – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan through PP. – Respondent

Cases Referred (15)

PRAKASH GUPTA, CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Mahaveer – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan through PP. – Respondent