SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SADHANA S.JADHAV, MILIND N.JADHAV
Maruti Navnath Sonawane – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Darshit Jain i/by AID Legal, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. A.A. Palkar, APP

JUDGMENT

Milind N. Jadhav, J.—By the present Appeal, the Appellant - Maruti Navnath Sonawane has prayed for the following relief:—

“(a) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to discharge the Appellant from the alleged entire proceedings arisen in final report arising out of FIR vide CR. No.70 of 2019 dated 07.04.2019 for alleged offence punishable u/s. 395, 397, 412, 341, 201 r/w 120 (B) of Indian Penal Code, section 3(i)(ii), 3(2) and 3(4) of Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 Act and u/s 37 (1) (A) r/w 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act registered at the instance of Kalachowki Police Station.”

2. A First Information Report (‘FIR’) came to be registered against the Appellant and other co-accused in Kalachowki Police Station vide C.R. No. 70 of 2019 dated 07.04.2019 for offences punishable under Sections 395, 397, 412, 341, 201 and 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) read with Section 37(1)(A) and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Appellant is arraigned as accused No.3 in the report.

3. On 11.05.2019, Respondent applied for approval to the Commis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top