JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Navneet Kumar, J.
Rasool Sheikh and Anr. – Appellants
versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.718 of 2004
Decided on 5.8.2022
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 307/34 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Sections 320 and 482 – Attempt to murder – Common intention – Compounding of offence – Offences which are non-compoundable cannot be compounded by a criminal Court under Section 320 of Cr.P.C. – In spite of that there is scope of compounding offences by invoking inherent powers of High Court vested under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of any court and/or to secure ends of justice by taking into consideration circumstances surrounding incident, manner and mode under which compromise has been arrived at between parties and due consideration to nature and seriousness of offence, in addition to conduct of accused, before and after incident – It is purely a civil nature dispute arising out of due to landed property and its nature is personal and society at large is not going to be affected – Appellants and informant are related to each other and they have settled their dispute amicably without any coercion and pressure and after resolving their disputes both parties are living peacefully – Appellants acquitted from charges levelled against them. (Paras 12 to 18)
Result: Appeal is allowed as compounded. Appellants acquitted.
JUDGMENT
This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 15.04.2004 and order of sentence dated 16.04.2004passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pakur in Sessions Case No. 61 of 2003 in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No. 201/2001, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 392 of 2001, Pakur, Jharkhand, whereby and where under the learned trial court convicted the appellants for the offence punishable u/s 307/34 of IPC, 1860 and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 07 years.
2. At the outset, it is found that the learned A.P.P. has filed a counter affidavit on behalf of the State stating therein that out of the three appellants one of the appellants namely Jahangir Sheikh son of the Late Hazi Toresh Ali has died on 13.11.2020 and the death certificate has also been issued by the competent authority by which it appears that the Jahangir Sheikh has died on 13.11.2020 and in this view of the matter, it is submitted that no near relative has come forward to continue with this appeal and, therefore, it is urged, let this appeal be abated with respect to the deceased appellant. Learned defence counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that since no close relative or near relative or kith and kin has come forward to continue with this appeal, let this appeal be abated by virtue of operation of law against the deceased appellant. Accordingly, this appeal is abated with respect to the deceased appellant Jahangir Sheikh. Let his name be deleted from the cause title of memo of appeal and the rest of the appellants are re- numbered as appellant no. 1- Rasool Sheikh and the appellant No. 2- Shafikul Sheikh.
3. The prosecution case arose out of fardbeyan of Noor Islam Sheikh son of Nekaeel Sheikh of village Rahaspur, P.S. Pakur (M) District Pakur on 10.09.2001, which was recorded by inspector S.I. Santosh Kumar Suman at about 9.45 p.m. The informant stated that on 10.09.2001 at 7 p.m. he had gone to the grocery shop of Anarul Sheikh for the purchase of some articles and was sitting on a Machan made of bamboo in front of the said shop when suddenly all the three accused persons, namely, Jahangir Sheikh, son of Tores Sheikh Shafikul Sheikh, son of Rasool Sheikh and Rasool Sheikh son of Jehar Sheikh came there and began abusing the informant. Accused Shafikul Sheikh was armed with rod and accused Rasool Sheikh was armed with a Chheni (hanusa). When the informant protested, the accused Jahangir Sheikh called upon the other two accused persons to kill the informant. Thereafter, accused Safikul Sheikh and accused Rasool Sheikh assaulted the informant on his head with rod and chheni as a result of which he fell down and started raising alarm (hulla) for help. It was further stated that the above two accused persons attempted to commit the murder of the informant and when the informant was trying to save himself he also sustained injury on his right hand. It was further stated in the fardbeyan of the informant that one year ago a mar-pit(altercation) had taken place with accused Rasool Sheikh and a case was pending in the court in connection with the said occurrence. On account of the said case, the accused persons committed this occurrence.
4. On the basis of aforesaid fardbeyan of the informant, a case under sections 323, 341, 324, and 307/34 of IPC was registered against all the three named accused persons vide Pakur (M) P.S. case No. 201/2001 and investigation was taken up. The injured informant was sent to Sub Divisional Hospital, Pakur for treatment. Sub-inspector Santosh Kumar Suman of Pakur (M) Police Station (P.W. 9) investigated the case. On completion of investigation he submitted charge sheet under sections 323, 341, 342, 307, 504/34 of IPC against all the three accused persons over which cognizance of the offence was taken and the case was committed to the court of sessions for trial. Learned Sessions Judge, Pakur had framed charge on 22nd August 2003 under section 307/34 of IPC.
5. Learned trial court aft
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Anr.
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and Ors.
Offences which are non-compoundable cannot be compounded by a criminal Court under Section 320 of Cr.P.C. – However, there is scope of compounding offences by invoking inherent powers of High Court v....
The court can allow the compounding of non-compoundable offences based on the settlement between the parties, considering the nature of the dispute and the impact on the parties involved.
The court can exercise its inherent powers to compound non-compoundable offences based on settlement and marriage between the parties, considering the peaceful nature of the dispute and the principle....
The court has the discretion to allow the compounding of offences based on the nature of the dispute and the settlement between the parties, as per the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Cou....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that even if an offense is non-compoundable, the court may allow the appeal to be compounded in cases involving a personal nature of dispute, peace....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.