SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Jay Ashokbhai Parekh – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Shalin Mehta, Anshul N. Shah, Advocates
For the Respondent:C.M. Shah, Advocate

ORDER

This is an application by the applicant under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with FIR No. 11191034220261 of 2022 registered with Naranpura Police Station, Ahmedabad for offence under Sections 420 and 114 etc. of Indian Penal Code and Section 66(d) of the Information Technology Act.

2. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant would submit that considering the nature of offence, the applicant may be enlarged on anticipatory bail by imposing suitable conditions.

3. On the other hand, the learned APP appearing for the respondent-State has opposed this application and granting anticipatory bail to the applicant looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

4. I have heard Mr. Shalin Mehta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Anshul N. Shah, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. appearing for the respective parties and perused the investigation papers and have also taken into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, role attributed to the applicant–accused and without discussing the evidence in detail, at this stage, I am inclined to grant anticipatory

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top