Back
A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
Ragati Hari – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of A. P. at Hyderabad – Respondent
ORDER
This is a Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code (“Cr.P.C.” for short), challenging the judgment in Criminal Appeal No.23 of 2007, dated 23.06.2008, on the file of I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, where under the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the Criminal Appeal filed by the petitioner, confirming the judgment in C.C.No.35 of 2006, dated 01.02.2007, on the file of the II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam.
2. The petitioner faced the trial under Section 304-A of Indian Penal Code (“I.P.C.” for short) in C.C.No.35 of 2006, dated 01.02.2007 and in the said case, the learned II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, found the petitioner guilty of the offence under Section 304-A of I.P.C. and after questioning the him, sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment for six months.
3. The parties to this Criminal Revision Case will hereinafter be referred as described before the trial Court, for the sake of convenience.
4. The State, represented by Sub-Inspector of Police, II Town Traffic Police Station, Visakhapatnam, filed charge sheet in Crime No.3 of 2006 of II To
On account of delay in recording statement of witness by Police, case of prosecution cannot be thrown out.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on prosecution evidence, including witness testimonies and reports, to establish the guilt of the accused under Section 304-A IPC.
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the assessment of evidence to determine the accused's culpability for driving in a rash and negligent manner, leading to a fatal accident and i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the prosecution's evidence, including eyewitness testimonies and documentary evidence, must establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonab....
The prosecution must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the offending vehicle at the time of the accident, that the accident was caused by the accused's rash and neglige....
The court confirmed that party negligence resulting in death is a breach of statutory duty under Section 304-A IPC, as supported by eyewitness testimony and accident investigation findings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
