SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V. SRISHANANDA
Bujji A K A Babu G – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka Rep. by Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Tigadi Veeranna Gadigeppa, Advocate
For the Respondents: Sri S. Vishwamurthy, HCGP

ORDER

Heard Sri. Tigadi Veeranna Gadigeppa, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State.

2. Respondent No.2, who is the complainant, though served with the notice of the petition, remained absent before this Court.

3. Brief facts of the case are as under:

A complaint came to be lodged by the second respondent with Bagepalli Police, Chikkaballapura District which was registered in Crime No.179/2022 on 27.04.2022, initially for the offence punishable under Section 363 of Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’).

4. Gist of the complaint averments reveal that the complainant belongs to Schedule Caste community and was the resident of 13th ward in Bagepalli Town along with her family members. She has a daughter (victim girl) aged 16 years. On 02.04.2022, the victim girl had been to church and at that juncture, the petitioner kidnapped her. Despite best efforts, the victim girl was not traced and therefore, the complainant approached the jurisdictional police with a missing complaint.

5. Police registered a case as aforesaid and investigated the matter. During the course of investigation, the investigating Agency was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top