SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B. P. ROUTRAY
Manoranjan Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D. Panda, Advocate
For the Opp. Party: Mr. K.K. Das, Additional Standing Counsel

JUDGMENT

The Petitioner has prayed to release him on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. He was arrested and remanded to custody on 4th September 2021 in connection with S.T.F. P.S. Case No.31 dated 3rd September 2021 for alleged commission of offences under Sections 21(c)/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act for transporting and possessing 1 kg 34 grams of brown sugar (heroin). Since then, the Petitioner is inside custody in connection with the aforesaid Police Case corresponding to T.R. Case No.126 of 2021 in the court of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Khordha.

2. The prayer for his release on default bail in terms of the provisions contained in Section 167 (2) of the Cr.P.C. read with Section 36-A(4) of the N.D.P.S. Act was earlier rejected by this Court in CRLMC No.625 of 2022. This Court in its order dated 25.04.2022 have held as follows:—

“xxx xxx xxx

2. Law is no more res integra on this issue. Recently in the case of M. Ravindran vs. Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, (2021) 2 SCC 485, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has reiterated the law that the date on which the accused was remanded to judicial custody has to be excluded from calculation of sta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top