JYOTSNA SHARMA
Manorama Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jyotsna Sharma, J.—Heard Sri Upendra Kumar Pushkar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Kamlesh Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 and 4 and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with prayer as below:—
“A. To set aside the order dated 22.05.2023 passed by Learned Special Court SC/ST, District-Agra as in Case Crime No. 178 of 2023 under sections 323, 506, 354(kha) of I.P.C., 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) and 3(2)(va) SC/ST Act 1987 (Amendment 2015) at Police Station-New Agra, District- Agra on the application dated 22.05.2023 filed by (victim)/petitioner for recording her restatement under section 164 of Cr.P.C. before video graphy has been rejected.
B. Issue a order or direction directing the Learned Special Court SC/ST, District-Agra to record the re-statement of Victim/petitioner before the videographi in Case Crime No. 178 of 2023 under sections 323, 506, 354(kha) of I.P.C., 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) and 3(2)(va) SC/ST Act 1987 (Amendment 2015) at Police Station- New Agra, District- Agra.”
3. The relevant facts of the case are as below:—
The petitioner lodged an F.I.R. naming four persons including resp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.