SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JYOTSNA SHARMA
Manorama Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Upendra Kumar Pushkar, Advocate
For the Respondents: Kamlesh Kumar Dwivedi, G.A.

JUDGMENT

Jyotsna Sharma, J.—Heard Sri Upendra Kumar Pushkar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Kamlesh Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 and 4 and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.

2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with prayer as below:—

“A. To set aside the order dated 22.05.2023 passed by Learned Special Court SC/ST, District-Agra as in Case Crime No. 178 of 2023 under sections 323, 506, 354(kha) of I.P.C., 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) and 3(2)(va) SC/ST Act 1987 (Amendment 2015) at Police Station-New Agra, District- Agra on the application dated 22.05.2023 filed by (victim)/petitioner for recording her restatement under section 164 of Cr.P.C. before video graphy has been rejected.

B. Issue a order or direction directing the Learned Special Court SC/ST, District-Agra to record the re-statement of Victim/petitioner before the videographi in Case Crime No. 178 of 2023 under sections 323, 506, 354(kha) of I.P.C., 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) and 3(2)(va) SC/ST Act 1987 (Amendment 2015) at Police Station- New Agra, District- Agra.”

3. The relevant facts of the case are as below:—

The petitioner lodged an F.I.R. naming four persons including resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top