SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G. BASAVARAJA
Praveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka, Rep. by State Public Prosecutor – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner Nos.1 to 8: Called Out and Absent)
For the Respondent: Sri. M.R. Patil, HCGP

ORDER

The revision petitioner Nos.1 to 8/accused have preferred this revision petition against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06.02.2013 passed in C.C.No.2886/2011 by the Court of the JMFC (IV Court), Mangalore (hereinafter referred to as ‘Trial Court’ for short) which is confirmed by the judgment dated 05.11.2014 passed in Crl.Appeal No.65/2013 by the Court of the IV Addl. District & Sessions Judge, D.K.Mangalore (hereinafter referred to as ‘Appellate Court’ for short).

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties in this appeal are referred to as per their status and rank before the Trial Court.

3. The case of the prosecution in brief is that on 28.11.2010, PW.6 Ravindra K.G., the Assistant Commissioner of Police, received information that the game of cards known as Andar Bahar (‘sic’) was being played at Room No.404 of Abhiman Residency Hotel, Mangalore. That on receiving that information, PW.6 along with PW.1 Dayanand, H.C.508, PW.4 Nitheesh G N and other two panchas raided the said spot i.e. Room No.404 of Abhiman Residency Hotel. That during that raid, these accused Nos.1 to 8 were found playing game of cards known as Andar Bahar (‘sic’). That thereafte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top