RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Praveer Bhatnagar, J.
Rajesh Sharma S/o Murari Lal – Petitioner
versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.2376 of 2024
Decided on 27.2.2024
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 439 – Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Sections 8/20 – Bail application – Leaves of cannabis plant containing 28.600 gms are shown to be recovered from accused petitioner – Section 2(iii)(b) of NDPS Act contains definition of Ganja and as per definition clause flowering of fruiting tops of cannabis plant falls within ambit of Ganja – Seeds and leaves without tops are not termed as Ganja – It is just and proper to enlarge accused-petitioner on bail – Bail application under Section 439, Cr.P.C. allowed. (Paras 5 and 6)
Result: Bail Application allowed.
ORDER
The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner -Rajesh Sharma. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.32/2024 registered at Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that accused-petitioner is an innocent person and has falsely implicated in the matter. He further submits that police showing false recovery of the contraband article “Ganja” whereas the contraband article recovered was not “Ganja” but the same was “Bhang” and the petitioner himself is the Bhang contractor and having valid license in his name. He further submits that contraband (leaves) does not fall within the definition of “Ganja” because it consists of leaves, seeds, buds and stalks of the cannabis plants. The leaves and stalks of cannabis plant are expressly excluded from the definition of Ganja. He further submits that as per Central Government notification S.O.527 dated 16.07.1996 specifying small quantity and commercial quantity of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, it does not prescribe commercial and small quantity of cannabis plant. Therefore, bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
4. Heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
5. Considered the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and the fact that leaves of cannabis plant containing 28.600 gms are shown to be recovered from the accusedpetitioner. Section 2 (iii)(b) of the NDPS Act contains the definition of Ganja and as per definition clause flowering of fruiting tops of cannabis plant falls within the ambit of Ganja. The seeds and leaves without tops are not termed as Ganja. Therefore, without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rajesh Sharma S/o Murari Lal in connection with FIR No.32/2024 registered at Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
Seeds and leaves without tops are not termed as Ganja.
The definition of 'Ganja' under the NDPS Act excludes leaves and seeds of cannabis plants, allowing bail for the accused-petitioner.
Leaves and seeds of cannabis without flowering tops do not constitute 'Ganja' under the NDPS Act.
Point of Law : Police has filed this charge-sheet for cultivation of cannabis plants as also possession of Ganja, if it failed to prove at the time of trial, if at all they are able to prove, that to....
Section 20 of N.D.P.S. Act reads as punishment for contravention in relation to cannabis plant and cannabis.
The court granted bail based on the lengthy duration of custody and the fact that co-accused had already been granted bail, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.