N. J. JAMADAR
Amjad Aslam Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER
The applicants who are arraigned in NCB/MZU/CR-18/2021 registered with Narcotics Control Bureau, Mumbai for the offences punishable under sections 20(b), 22(c), 27, 27A, 28 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (the NDPS Act, 1985) seek to be enlarged on bail.
2. On 27th February, 2021 an information was received that Amjad Shaikh (A/1), the applicant in Bail Application No. 215 of 2022, and Aijaz Supariwala (A/2) had in their possession narcotic drug/ psychotropic substance at Room No. 37, Arab Galli, Amtullah Apartment, C wing, Mumbai-8 and Room No. 27-B, Pathawadi, Piru Lane, Imam Wada, Mumbai-9 and were selling the same to their purchasers, in small quantity. After complying with the procedural requirements and obtaining authorization under section 41(2) of the NDPS Act, 1985, a team of NCB conducted raid at Room No. 37. The applicant Amjad Shaikh (A/1) was present in the said room. In the search of the said room, a black bag was found in an Alimirah. Upon opening, three small polythene pouches containing powder were found kept therein. The applicant Amjad Shaikh (A/1) claimed the said bag and stated that the substance contained in three polyt
Balbir Kaur vs. State of Punjab
State of Punjab vs. Malkiat Singh
Om Prakash @ Baba vs. State of Rajasthan
Statement recorded under Section 67 of NDPS Act, 1985 cannot be used as a confessional statement in trial for offence under NDPS Act, 1985.
[The court established that in drug-related cases, the prosecution must demonstrate conscious possession and adhere to proper sampling procedures. Delays in proceedings can impact the right to bail, ....
The court reaffirmed that compliance with Section 52-A of the NDPS Act is crucial for the admissibility of evidence in drug-related cases, and procedural lapses can significantly weaken the prosecuti....
The court held that in cases of commercial quantity under the NDPS Act, bail can only be granted if the accused demonstrates reasonable grounds for believing innocence and that he will not reoffend, ....
The court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural safeguards in drug-related cases, granting bail due to significant delays and procedural lapses.
The court emphasized strict compliance with procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act, highlighting that significant lapses can undermine the prosecution's case, especially in light of prolonged incar....
The court reaffirmed that non-compliance with procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act, particularly Section 52A, does not automatically entitle an accused to bail; the court must still find reasonab....
The court ruled that mere procedural lapses do not justify bail in cases involving commercial quantities of narcotics, emphasizing the presumption of conscious possession under the NDPS Act.
Procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial; failure to adhere to sampling and inventory requirements can undermine the prosecution's case and justify bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.