Rohan Naik VS State of Madhya Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

PREM NARAYAN SINGH
Rohan Naik – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants: Ms. Savita Rathore, learned counsel and Shri Chandra Bhusan Pandey, learned counsel
For the Respondent-State: Shri Surendra Gupta, learned GA

ORDER

The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of CrPC for quashment of FIR dated 03/05/2024 and quashment of the proceedings u/s376,506,376(2)(n),201 of the IPC & chargesheet dated 14/06/2024 and subsequent proceedings arising out of crime no.164/2024 registered by P.S. Palasia, Indore on 03/05/2024 S.T. No.417/2024 pending before District and Session Judge, Indore.

2. As per the prosecution story, prosecutrix made complaint against the applicant regarding physically exploitation and having relationship by breaking trust and developed physical relationship. It is alleged against the applicant that, on February 2022 Prosecutrix met with present applicant in Mithya Club Indore. Then they started talking with each other. The proposal for marriage was made by the present applicant which was verbally accepted by the complainant. Thereafter the present applicant has started visiting her house. Due to the love affair present applicant used to take complainant to house, hotels and outside Indore for establishing physical relations. The present applicant always used to tell the complainant that when he settled down once after that he would marry her. Present applican