SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BIRENDRA KUMAR
Jakir Kha @ Jakir Hussein – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: Mr. Nishant Motsara
For the Respondents: Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP

ORDER

Heard the parties.

2. This is an appeal under Section 14-A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against order dated 04.05.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Hanumangarh in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.16/2023, whereby the learned Special Judge has framed charges against the appellant for offence under Sections 307/149, 386/149 IPC and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

3. Respondent No.2 was already served with notice, however, no one appears on his behalf.

4. Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

5. Contention of the appellant is that a bare perusal of the FIR No.821 dated 10.12.2022 registered with Police Station Hanumangarh Junction, District Hanumangarh, which led to initiation of trial against the appellant would reveal that ingredients of offence under Section 307/149 or of offence under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act are prima facie not made out.

6. Learned counsel contends that no other material was collected during investigation to substantiate prima facie case for proceeding with the trial against the appellant.

7. According to FIR, unknown

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top