SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PANKAJ PUROHIT
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Attar Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant: Mr. Karan Anand, learned counsel

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Pankaj Purohit, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. By means of this C528 application, applicant has challenged the order dated 13.08.2024 passed by learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Dehradun in Criminal Appeal No. 41 of 2024, Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others, whereby the application filed by the applicant i.e. for exempting him for depositing 20% of the amount of compensation was rejected vide order dated 14.02.2024.

3. Applicant was convicted under Section 138 of the N.I. Act vide the judgment and order dated 19.01.2024 passed by learned Additional CJM Dehradun in Complaint Case No. 2107 of 2019, Attar Singh vs. Ashok Kumar and sentenced to undergo six months’ simple imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,90,000/- , with default stipulation of one month additional simple imprisonment. Thereafter, applicant preferred a Criminal Appeal No.41 of 2024, Ashok Kumar vs. Attar Singh & others, wherein while admitting the appeal vide order dated 14.02.2024, he was directed to deposit 20% of the compensation i.e. Rs.2,18,000/- within ten days. The said amount was not deposited. On application moved by applicant on 20.04.2024, he was given 30 days more t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top