SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R. T. VACHHANI
Deep Rajendrakumar Shah – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant No.1: Mr. Sikander Saiyed (3458)
For the Respondent No.1: Mr. H K Patel, APP

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

By way of filing the captioned revision application under Section 438 read with Section 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short BNSS, 2023), the petitioner seeks to challenge order dated 24.10.2024 passed below Exhibit-20 in ACB Special Case No.2 of 2024 by the Court of learned Special Judge (ACB) and Principle Session Judge, Junagadh whereby the said application filed under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short seeking to discharge from the alleged charges came to be rejected.

Factual Matrix:

2. The case of the petitioner as emerging from the FIR are that on 19.01.2024, when original complainant was on duty, he received a letter dated 19.01.2024 from one Mr.Kartik Bhanderi that his account was freeze by Cyber Crime Cell Junagadh and when he requested to defreeze his account to accused no.1 and 3 as named in the FIR, they refused get his account defreeze and demanded Rs.25 Lacs in lieu of getting the account defreeze and thus complaint was registered followed by the inquiry. It is further alleged in the FIR that said Mr.Kartik Bhanderi tried to get defreeze his bank account and therefore, he called Cyber Crime Cell, Junagadh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top