ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Rajesh Singh Chauhan and
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, JJ
Jagdamba Harijan – Appellant
versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1841 of 2018
Decided on 12.2.2026
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 304 and 326-A – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 374(2) – Acid attack and assault by stick – Conviction and sentence – Acid attacks in India predominantly target women and young girls, with perpetrators almost always men, making it a form of gender-based violence – Acid attacks not only cause damage to physical appearance of its victims but also cause immense psychological trauma thereby becoming a hurdle in their overall development – Delay in filing FIR alone cannot refute entire prosecution story – If testimony of witnesses presented by prosecution is credible, this technicality alone does not adversely affect prosecution – Delay in lodging of F.I.R. has been sufficiently explained – Balancing gravity of offence with principles of justice and need of society to live in a peaceful, safe and congenial environment with chance of reformation and integrating appellant into society, maximum sentence of life awarded to appellant reduced to a fixed term of 14 years) Rigorous Imprisonment – However, fine under Sections 304 and 326A I.P.C. and punishment and fine under Section 452 IPC affirmed. (Paras 10, 11, 21, 23, 39 and 40)
Result: Criminal Appeal partly allowed.
JUDGMENT
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, J.—Heard Shri R.P. Mishra, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant as well as Shri S.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the materials available on record.
2. The present Criminal Appeal under Section 374(2) has been preferred by the appellant- Jagdamba Harijan, against the impugned Judgment and order dated 30.08.2018, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-II, Court No.2, Pratapgarh, in Sessions Trial No. 08 of 2015 (State vs. Jagdamba Harijan), arising out of Case Crime No. 147 of 2014, relating to Police Station Aaspur Devsara, District Pratapgarh, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Sections 304, 326-A & 452 I.P.C. and sentenced under Sections 304 & 326-A I.P.C. for life imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/- and under Section 452 I.P.C. for rigorous imprisonment of 02 years with fine of Rs.5000/- and to further undergo six months’ additional imprisonment in case of default in payment of fine. However, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the appellant for the offence under Section 323 I.P.C.
Case of the Prosecution
3. The factual matrix leading up to the filing of the present Criminal Appeal is delineated herein-below:—
3.1) In the present case, with respect to an incident occurred in the intervening night of 07/08.05.2014 at about 2:00 AM, a written ‘tehrir’ (Exhibit-Ka-1) was filed at Police Station Aaspur Devsara, District Pratapgarh, by the informant/complainant Dinesh Verma, who is the son/ brother-in-law of the deceased. In the said tehrir, it was alleged that while the informant was sleeping in a thatched shed (chappar) in front of his house, he heard screams raised by his mother, (Phoolan Devi) and sister-in-law (Suman Devi). Upon rushing inside the house, he noticed that acid had been thrown on the faces and bodies of his mother and sister-in-law.
3.2) It was further stated by Dinesh Verma (P.W.-1) that in the light of torch, he saw the present appellant- Jagdamba Harijan, at the place of occurrence, holding a stick in his hand. Another person was also present beside him, whose identity could not be ascertained as his face was covered with a cloth. P.W.-1 further stated that he recognised the appellant, as he had earlier visited informant’s house on a couple of occasions and used to frequently visit the house of his sister-in-law, even prior to her marriage, a fact which came to the knowledge of the family only after the marriage. It was also alleged that the appellant had previously extended threats to kill the informant’s brother i.e. husband of Suman Devi. The informant further stated that when he attempted to chase the assailants on the said date of incident from the crime spot, they assaulted him with a stick and thereafter, fled from the spot on a motorcycle. It was also alleged that the father-in-law of the informant’s brother had been subjected to regular harassment by a neighbour belonging to the ‘Pasi’ caste.
3.3) On the basis of aforesaid written information/tehrir (Exhibit-ka1), a F.I.R./Case Crime No. 147 of 2014, under Sections 323, 326-A and 452 I.P.C. was registered on 09.05.2014 at 11:00 am, against the present appellant at Police Station Aaspur Devsara, District Pratapgarh and the investigation commenced.
3.4) The Appellant was arrested by the Police on 13.05.2014 and during investigation Suman Devi succumbed to burn injuries on 22.05.2014 and Phoolan Devi on 29.05.2014. Thus, after completion of the investigation, the Investigating Officer submitted the charge-sheet against the appellant under Sections 304, 323, 326-A and 452 I.P.C. The learned Trial Court framed charges under the aforesaid Sections, to which the appellant pleaded not guilty and claimed for Trial.
4. Proceedings before the Trial Court
4.1) During trial, in order to prove the charges against the appellant, the prosecution examined the following witnesses:-
| P.W.-1 | Dinesh Kumar Verma | Complainant (Son/brother in law of the deceased) |
| P.W.-2 | Mahesh Verm | |
Bengai Mandal v. State of Bihar
Parivartan Kendra v. Union of India and Ors.
Ravinder Kumar and Anr. v. State of Punjab
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Gian Chand
Acid attack – Acid attacks not only cause damage to physical appearance of its victims but also cause immense psychological trauma – Delay in filing FIR alone cannot refute entire prosecution story.
Acid attack conviction under IPC §§304, 326A upheld on eyewitness testimony despite FIR delay and minor discrepancies; life sentence reduced to 14 years fixed term balancing retribution, time served,....
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; mere testimony of the victim is insufficient without corroboration.
Acid Attack - Eye witnesses - Admissibility of - As a consequence of fact that injuries to the witness is an inbuilt guarantee of his presence at scene of crime and because the witness would not want....
A conviction for an acid attack was overturned due to lack of credible evidence linking the accused, highlighting the necessity of substantial proof in sensitive cases involving caste dynamics.
(1) Murder, attempt to murder and rioting – When genesis and manner of incident itself are doubtful, benefit of doubt should always be in favour of accused.(2) Appreciation of evidence – While apprec....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.