SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.K.PHAUJDAR, J.C.MISHRA
Ramawati Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


IMPORTANT POINT

Provisions of Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act are not ultra vires the Constitution.

JUDGMENT

J.C. Misra, J. - The basic prayer in both these writ petitions cover the constitutional validity of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (for short. N.I. Act). The petitioners in these two matters have been prosecuted for an offence under Section 138 of the N.I Act as the cheques they had issued to pay up their debts had bounced for lack of proper fund in the respective accounts. The provision under the aforesaid section have been challenged as violative of Articles 14, 19, 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India hence a prayer was made to declare the provisions ultra vires of the Constitution and to further quash the criminal proceedings initiated under that section against the petitioners.

2. The case against Ramawati Sharma was filed by Rahul Malayiya in complaint no. 5376 of 1995 and the gist of the complaint case is that the accused had taken a loan from the complainant and with a view to repay the same she had issued a cheque dated 10-4-1995.

The cheque was drawn on through Allahabad Bank at Delhi and it was deposited in Indian Overseas Bank. Allahabad.




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top