K.NATARAJAN
Ashok Muthanna – Appellant
Versus
Escorts Finance Ltd. – Respondent
K. Natarajan, J. - In this petition, the petitioners who are accused 2 to 8 before the trial Court are seeking to quash the entire proceedings in C.C. No. 8736 of 1999 on the file of the XIV
Metropolitan Magistrate. Egmore.
2. The short facts are:
The respondent/Complainant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (herein after referred to as the Act for short) against the petitioners and three others as the cheque issued for Rs. 24.99,840/- had been dishonoured. Accused No.1 is the company and accused 9 and 10 are the signatories of accused No.1 except the bald allegation that the petitioners are directors no overact has been attributed to them in the complaint. The complaint without even ascertaining the fact the petitioners 3 and 6 are dead and petitioners 4. 5 and 7 have retired from the company two years ago has filed the complaint. Petitioners 4. 5 and 7 are only employees of the first accused company and they left the services of the company in 1997 itself, but they have been wrongly described as Directors of the company.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners strenously contended except the vague allegation in the complaint that the peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.