D.G. DESHPANDE, J.:---This is a group of 23 Criminal Revision Applications alongwith 23 Criminal Writ Petitions. Out of these 23 Criminal Revision Applications, 10 have been filed by learned Advocate Mr. G.K. Tamba, 3 have been filed by the learned Senior Advocate Mr. V.B. Nadkarni, 8 have been filed by learned Advocate Mr. J.P. Mulgaokar and 2 have been filed by learned Advocate Mr. Kholkar. All the 23 Criminal revision Applications have been filed by the original complainant against the order of the Sessions Judge by which the order of issue of process issued against the accused Suresh Prabhakar Prabhu was quashed and set aside. All the Criminal Writ Petitions have been filed by the accused Suresh P. Prabhu challenging certain observations and finding of the Sessions Judge in the same order, eventhough ultimately the order of the Sessions Judge was in his favour.

2. I heard learned Advocate Mr. G.K. Tamba in respect of his 10 Criminal Revision Applications, Mr. Nadkarni, learned Senior Advocate, in respect of his 3 Criminal Revision Applications, learned Advocate Mr. J.P. Mulgaokar, in respect of his 8 Criminal Revision Applications and learned Advocate Mr. Kholkar, in res