A.M.KAPADIA
Hashmikant M. Sheth – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
A.M. Kapadia, J.— In this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (‘the Code’ for short) the petitioner against whom Criminal Complaint bearing No. 558 of 2003 is filed in the Court of learned Judicial Magi-strate, First Class, Ahmedabad (Rural) for commission of alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instru-ments Act (‘the Act’ for short) in which process has been issued, has prayed to quash and set aside the complaint and process issued thereunder, on the grounds stated in the petition.
2.The petitioner is the original accused whereas respondent No. 2 is the original complainant in the above refe-rred criminal complaint. Therefore, for the sake of convenience and brevity, the petitioner is referred to as “the accused” whereas respondent No. 2 is referred to as “the complainant” hereinafter in this Judgment.
3.As per the averments made in the petition, the accused came in contact with the complainant and therefore as and when the accused was in need of money he used to borrow money from the complainant. The transaction started between both of them since 1992-93 and the last transaction between took place in the year 1998. In tha
1.Urban Co-operative Credit Society, Borsad v. State of Gujarat and another
2.NEPC Micon Ltd. and others v. Megma Leasing Ltd.
3.Goaplast Pvt. Ltd. v. Shri Chico Ursula D’Souza and another
4.M/s. Dada Silk Mills and others v. Indian Overseas bank and Banking Co., Surat and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.