SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 149

D.P.BUCH
URBAN CO OP CREDIT SOC. THRO ITS MANAGAER JAYRAJBHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.C.SEJPAL, MIHIR J.THAKOR, S.J.DAVE, T.S.NANAVATI

D. P. BUCH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner-original complainant in criminal case No. 1316/99 before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class at Borsad in Kheda district, has preferred these two criminal revisions under section 397 read with section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (for short, the Code), in order to challenge a common and consolidated order recorded by the said Court on 27. 4. 2001 in the aforesaid criminal case below applications Exh. 22 and 25 filed by different set of accused persons facing the said criminal case.

( 2 ) OUT of these two revisions, criminal revision application No. 304/2001 has been filed against the said order passed by the said court on an application of respondent no. 2 who was accused no. 5 in the said criminal case whereas revision application No. 305/2001 has been filed by the petitioner against the discharge of other accused persons who were facing the said criminal case before the said court.

( 3 ) THE facts of the case of the present petitioner-original complaint before the trial court in the aforesaid criminal case may be briefly stated as follows: the present petitioner-original complainant had filed criminal case no. 1316/99 before





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top