J.M.PANCHAL
Satish Chand Singhal – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat and Ors. – Respondent
J.M. Panchal, J. —By filing above numbered three applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner who is ordered to be impleaded as an accused under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act” for short) in Criminal Case No.129/99, Criminal Case No. 127/99 and Criminal Case No. 128/99 instituted by the respondent No.2 in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surendranagar, against the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 has prayed to
quash the above numbered three criminal cases lodged by the respondent No.2.
2. The facts emerging from all the above numbered three applications are common and, therefore, this Court proposes to refer to the facts of Criminal Misc. Application No. 6682/2005 for convenience, which are as under.
3. The respondent No.2, who is original complainant, is proprietor of Bharat Cotton Company, which is dealing in cotton bales at Surendranagar. The respondent No.3 i.e. Mr. Anil Gupta, is Director of the respondent No.4 company whereas the respondent No.4 i.e. R.P. Texfab Limited, is a company
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.