P.S.NARAYANA
Ganivada Peddi Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Koppaka Venkata Rao – Respondent
P.S. Narayana, J.— While admitting the matter on 14.12.2009, this Court ordered notice in Criminal M.P. No.10219 of 2009 and directed that the matter be listed after eight weeks.
2. Notice had been served on the first respondent/complainant and Sri C. Praveen Kumar, the learned counsel entered the appearance on behalf of the first respondent/complainant.
3. Heard Sri K. Subrahmanyam, the learned counsel representing the petitioner/accused, Sri C. Praveen Kumar, representing the first respondent/complainant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the second respondent-State.
4. This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter in short referred to as “the Code” for the purpose of convenience) praying to quash all the proceedings in CC No. 19 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, V. Madugula, Visakhapatnam District.
5. Sri K. Subrahmanyam, the learned counsel representing the petitioner/accused would maintain that taking cognizance of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, cannot be sustained. The learned counsel po
1. Inder Mohan Goswami & Anr. v. State of Uttaranchal & Ors.
2. R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab
3. State of Karnataka v. Muniswamy & Ors.
4. Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia & Ors. v. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angree & Ors.
6. Janata Dal v. H.S. Chowdhary & Ors.
7. Roy V.D. v. State of Kerala
8. Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. & Ors. v. Mohd. Sharaful Haque & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.