SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.P.Garg
M. P. Singh Sahni – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners: In person.
For the Respondents: Mr. Harnam Singh in person.

JUDGMENT

S.P. Garg, J.—M.P. Singh Sahni (hereinafter referred as the petitioner or accused) has preferred various petitions Crl. M.C. Nos. 3772/2003, 2444-45/2005, 54/2008, 2790/2000, 3773/2003, 3779/2003, 3781 /2003,3782/2003, 3784/2003, 3193/2005 and 3783/2003 for quashing of the various criminal proceedings initiated against him by Harnam Singh(hereinafter referred as complainant or respondent).

2. Case of the complainant is that he is a highly qualified ex-banker having an experience of seventeen years. He was earlier posted at Senior Executive level in a Nationalized Bank. The petitioner and his wife Narider Pal Kaur Sahni engaged him to provide professional services in respect of non-delivery of 40,000 shares of M/s. Essar Gujarat Ltd. and for clearance of 11 FDRs with Kuwait International Finance Company (KIFCO). For that purpose, an agreement dated 22.07.1991 and irrevocable Power of Attorney dated 01.08.1991 were executed. Supplementary agreement dated 09.10.1992 was also executed. Again, an agreement/ memorandum of understanding dated 07.03.1995 and subsequent agreement dated 14.03.1995 were executed along with irrevocable General Power of Attorney (GPA) dated 18.05.1995 in
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top