S. Manikumar, J.—Request of the petitioner to refer the disputed cheque dated 18.2.2013 to the Director, Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, to find out the age of the signature, has been rejected, vide order made in Crl.M.P.No.2070 of 2014 in C.C.No.77 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court), Vellore District dated 2.12.2014 and that the same is impugned in this Criminal Revision Case on the grounds inter alia that the Court below has failed to consider the petitioner’s case that he has not issued the cheque to the respondent and from the very beginning, the petitioner has denied issuance of the cheque.

2. Reliance is placed on the decision in Elumalai v. Subramani, 2011 (3) CTC 616 this Court held as follows:

The aforenoted opinions of the reputed authors on this subject as narrated above would On the basis of choosy and discerning performance of researches, the authors have provided The scientist can elect non-destructive The expression that there is no scientific method available anywhere in the country or The advancements in establishing the facts in this field as a science continue through The above said discu