SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Shiv Dial Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jitender Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. G.C. Shahpuri, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Rameshwar Singh Malik, J.—To be referred to the Reporter or not?

2. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Applicant, by way of instant application under Section 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’), seeks leave of this court for filing appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 10.10.2014, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bilaspur, whereby complaint of the present applicant under Sections 138/142 of Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed, by passing the impugned judgment of acquittal.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant paid an amount of Rs.2,50,000 to the accused-respondent as a friendly loan. He further submits that the applicant was having sufficient agricultural land and he duly proved his source for the amount in question. After some time, accused-respondent issued the cheque in question in favour of the applicant. When the cheque was dishonoured for insufficient funds, applicant was left with no other option, except to file the complaint under Sections 138/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the present respondent-accused. Learned counsel for the applicant would furt












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top