SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.MANIKUMAR
Mohammed Kasim – Appellant
Versus
K. Rayappan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr.N.Manokaran, Advocate.

ORDER

S. Manikumar, J.—Criminal Revision Case is preferred against the order passed in C.M.P.No.2015 of 2014 dated 17.09.2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Gobichettipalayam.

2. Material on record discloses that the petitioner has floated, a company in the name and style “Realway Investment and Forex Trading India Limited” and running the same, at D.No.86, Sri Subburam Complex, Kutcherry Medu, Gopichettipalayam. Advertisements have been made in newspapers that if deposits are made as per the schemes, rich dividends would be paid. Believing the same, on 28.03.2009, the respondent deposited Rs.5,00,000/- and thereafter, a further sum of Rs.2,80,000/- was also deposited by way of ICICI Cheques. Thereafter, a sum of Rs.2,20,000/- was paid in cash. In all Rs.10,00,000/- was deposited. Dividends for the first two months alone was paid. Thereafter, despite request, no payment was made.

3. It is the further case of the complainant that on 28.05.2010, in the capacity of an authorised signatory of Realway Enterprises India Private Limited, the 1st petitioner gave a cheque bearing No.002841 for Rs.3,28,000/- drawn on ICICI Bank, West Mambalam Branch, Chennai. The respond
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top