J.B.PARDIWALA
Murjibhai Vishram Varsani – Appellant
Versus
Adam Alimamad Kumbhar – Respondent
J.B. Pardiwala, J.—By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant – original accused seeks to invoke the inherent powers of this Court, praying for quashing of the proceedings of the Criminal Case No.1834 of 2014 pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bhuj, for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
2. The applicant herein is one of the partners of a partnership firm running in the name of Varsani Construction Company. One another partner of the firm and an authorised signatory, namely, Rajeshbhai Varsani, issued a cheque of the amount of Rs.1 lac dated 20th August 2014 in favour of the complainant drawn on the HDFC Bank. The said cheque came to be dishonoured. In such circumstances, the complaint came to be lodged in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhuj-Kachchh, registered as Criminal Case No.1834 of 2014. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant accused has too fold submissions to canvass. He submits that the applicant indisputably has not signed the cheque. At best, vicarious liability can be fastened by virtue of Section 141 of the Negotiable
Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels & Tours Private Limited
Bihta Co-operative Development Cane Marketing Union Ltd. v. Bank of Bihar
Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer
Charanjit Pal Jindal v. L.N.Metalics
Dattatraya Govind Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.