SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SANDEEP SHARMA
Anu Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Prem P. Chauhan, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. G.S. Rathour, Advocate, Advocate

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Sandeep Sharma, J.—Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with order dated 2.2.2019 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nurpur, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh in Case No. 295-IV/16, whereby an application under S.145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter, ‘Act’), having been filed by the petitioner-accused (hereinafter, ‘accused’), seeking therein permission to cross-examine the respondent-complainant (hereinafter, ‘complainant’), came to be dismissed, accused has approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under S.482 CrPC, praying therein to set aside the impugned order and permit the accused to cross-examine the complainant.

2. Necessary facts, as emerge from the record are that the complainant initiated proceedings under S.138 of the Act against the accused in the competent Court of law, alleging therein that a Term Loan facility was availed by the accused amounting to Rs.5,75,000/- on 17.12.2014 for the purchase of Tractor. Entire loan amount was paid by the complainant to the dealer. Accused opened account No. JT-72 with the Bank and he, with a view to discharge his liability on account of loan availed by him, issued Cheque No. 656

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top