SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Pat) 63

REUBEN, NARAYAN
Sailajananda Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Lakhichand Sao – Respondent


Judgment

Reuben, J.

1. This is an appeal by the pltfs. from a decision of the Addl. Dist. J. Purulia, confirming a decree of the Addl. Subordinate Judge, Dhanbad.

2. Pltf. 1 is the proprietor of village Muraidih in pargana Newagarh of the Dhanbad Sub-division. Pltf. 2 is his minor son. Pltf. 1 has executed in favour of his son a mokarari lease in respect of 25 bighas of coal bearing land in this village. The suit was brought to eject the defts. from five kathas out of this land, on the allegation that they have wrongfully taken possession of a coal quarry therein sunk by the pltf. 1. Defendant 2 is the son of deft. 1. They contested the suit, alleging that they are holding the suit land as a part of 46 bighas of coal-bearing land in this village, the surface & underground rights in which were settled with deft. 1 in 1910 by the then proprietors, Shyamlal Pande & others under an unregistered grant, & claiming to have acquired an indefeasible interest in the land by holding it adversely since then.

3. Pltf. 1 is the son of Shyamlal Pande, but does not derive his title by inheritance from him. According to the reoitals in the plaint, this village was sold in execution of a mtge. decree






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top