SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Pat) 10

REUBEN, B.P.JAMUAR
Lal Suraj Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Ram Charitar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Reuben, J.

1. This is an appeal by defendant 4 against an order of the District Judge of Motihari, reversing a decision of the Subordinate Judge of the same place.

2. The suit was brought by the plaintiff-respondent for partition of 21 bighas purchased by him on 10th October 1941, from defendants 6 and 7 out of their half share of a tenancy of 61 bighas 7 kathas in village Jagdishpur, taken in settlement from the Turkaulia Factory on 13th February 1922, by their father Kripal Narain Singh and certain other persons. According to the plaintiff, the settlees were (1) Kripal Narain, (2) defendants 2 and 3, who are brothers (3) Chaturbbuj Sahay deceased, father of defendants 5 and (4) Jadulal deceased, father of defendant 1, whereas defendant 4 denies that Chaturbhuj and Jadulal had any interest in the property: The Courts below did not find it necessary to investigate this point, as they were merely concerned with the share of Kripal Narain and the parties were in agreement that his share was one-half.

3. In the year 1929 the tenancy was sold in execution of a certificate for arrears of rent filed by the Battiah Estate, to whom the landlords interest had by then passed, and was












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top