SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Pat) 23

C.P.SINHA, B.P.SINHA
Baijnath Sao – Appellant
Versus
Ram Prasad – Respondent


Judgment

C.P.Sinha, J.

1. This is a defts. appeal which arises out of a suit filed by the pltf. for a declaration that the order of eviction by the Comr. Of the Patna Division, dated 29-8-1947, passed under the Bihar Buildings Control Act, 1947, is ultra-vires, null & void, without jurisdiction & not; binding on the pltf.; the pltf has also prayed for the issue of a permanent injunction restraining the deft. from ousting the pltf. from any portion of holding No. 23, circle No. 16 ward No. 8, situate in mahalla Sabzibagh of Bankipur.

2. The first Ct. dismissed the suit, but it has been decreed on appeal by Mr. K. K. Dutta, Addl. Subordinate Judge, 2nd Ct. Patna, by his judgement dated 23-2-1948.

3. The pltf.s case is that the entire holding No. 23 as well as holding No. 22, which is adjacent north of it, belonged to Messrs. T. C. Palit & S. C. Palit, that out of these two holdings, holding No. 22 was the tenancy of the deft. applt. & the northern portion of holding No. 23 was in the tenancy of one Lachhmi Mistry & the southern portion of holding No. 23, which is the portion in. dispute, has been in the tenancy of the pltf.s family since several generations & the pltf. holds-a shop &
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top