SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Pat) 83

AHMAD
Parhan Mahto – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Forest Officer – Respondent


Judgment

Ahmad, J.

1. This application in revision is directed against an order convicting the petitioner for having committed an offence under Sec. 49, Bihar Private Forests Act. The petitioner has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of fifteen days.

2. The case for the prosecution, briefly stated, is that the private forest of Pokharia has been constituted a private protected forest under the provisions of the Bihar Private Forests Act, 1947 (IX of 1948). On 22nd September, 1949, the petitioner, along with seven others, was detected by one Jugeshwar Singh, who was patrolling in the jungle, cutting wood. Babu Radha Krishna Ram, Beat Officer, on information came to the spot, and asked the petitioner to show his permit, but he could not show it. The Beat Officer tried to seize the wood; but he was resisted. He, therefore, sent information to the police station through the forest guard, and he himself remained with the petitioner there. The forest guard returned with two constables. The wood was seized in a village called Dhabia, and kept in the custody of one Dhanuki Singh. The Beat Officer wrote down a seizure report (exhibit 2). He also wrote a report about t






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top